Things like 'culture jamming' spring to mind, but without having been there for the choice to use them in various publications I can't say how gratuitous and wasteful the popularization and use of that shorthand is. I'd have to physically present you an example in-context as well as a grasp upon the foundation of the term in question and that'd require me to do so.
I mean the practice conforms to the same kind of patterned prescriptive post as>>1346611
Is it, that, by using a 'technical term' and in doing so limiting the ambiguity of connected context the goal itself is achieved? Is the purpose simply to make the language shittier, to cut down on the capacity for legitimate arguments to be formed in response and thereby turn a blind eye to the at best middling modality of their actual conclusions?