[ 76 / egy / h / kc / librejp / sp / v ] [ ukko ]

/76/ - 76chan

It's like 76chan, but on sportschan.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
:
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Onion domain: http://ylcjjrqko7pgobnvzreemm565ea3oj3c7rfqqb4x4twmay6hafv54mid.onion/

File: 1579844503394.jpg (69.19 KB, 811x1030, 811:1030, 1d4179658edf96d3d377c9ad99….jpg)

 No.446

Lolifuckers.

https://sportschan.org/librejp/res/15365.html

You know that villains may complain to the Russian ROSKOMNADZOR of your Japanese pedophilia.
And they, in turn, will send an abuse email to your hosting provider and domain registrar. It doesn’t matter which country your server is located in, and who the domain registrar is, child pornography is prohibited everywhere.
In 90% of cases, the hosters will not argue, and they will delete your server, and the domain can also be divided. Just a warning. There are bad people, and they can take advantage of this. Many Russian-language boards were destroyed by abuses on child pornography.

 No.447

good night /int/

 No.448

its 2d bro

 No.449

>>448
You need to explain this to your FBI officer.

 No.450

They would test it against obscenity tests and they would find it has artistic value, so it is legal.
It seems that depicting lolis having sex is problematic.
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/obscenity
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-obscenity
Maybe there are other laws which they might apply in these situations. Maybe not. Really someone with at least a minimal educational background in US law should add his onions here.

 No.453

The claim that it's banned everywhere is just false. It varies from country to country and is unclear in some places. For instance, this is the official Austrian response to an UN committee:
https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CRC/Guidelines/Austria.docx
>1. According to the Committee’s proposal drawings and cartoons can be regarded as child pornography in the sense of Article 2 letter c of the OPSC. In this context, we would like to point out that the definition of child pornography in the more recent EU Directive 2011/93/EU comprises
>1. depictions of a real child (Article 2 letter c (i) and (ii)
>1. depictions of any person appearing to be a child (Article 2 letter c (iii)
>2. realistic images of a child (Article 2 letter c (iv).
>As far as drawings and cartoons do not contain realistic images, we do not see the necessity to treat them as child pornography.
If it were simply illegal in Austria they would not have written this. Moldova is another example, housing a rather famous site. In America it's a legal grey area with variation at the state level. Several large sites devoted exclusively to the topic are based on American servers and nothing happens to them. Social, not legal pressure is what can bring down a site in this case.

 No.454

>>450
It's fine typically as far as us law goes very few people have ever been convinted of having it being criminal in ths us ever their like little legal outliers not the norm
Its obtainable stuff on mainstream us sites like top 100 in traffic overall
So the odds of sportschan getting killed for hosting this content are phenomenally low
t. A college student with two law classes

 No.455

File: 1580130288989.jpg (116.64 KB, 822x756, 137:126, 1547625813974.jpg)

I believe only one guy ever got arrested for loli over here, and in that case it was realistic 3D models rather than anime grills. Still pretty retarded tho.

 No.461

>sportschan is an american based board
>russia thinks it can impose its laws on an american site
>loli is perfectly legal in the US
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256
>see where it talks about virtual depictions being illegal if it’s “indistinguishable”

please go away USSR

 No.462


 No.463

test

 No.464

cool

 No.489

>>461
At least he's trying to help. Sounds like he's seen it happen before, so he knows what he's talking about

Also CP is being posted here right now. /sp/ has a 100+ thread filled with that shit SICK!, so he's not all wrong

 No.498

>>489
It won't happen. He's wrong about its legality and there are more than enough strong precedents of it not happening.

 No.693

>>498
Well, you were wrong buddy. Site got knocked down a few months after you made this post because of the same thing OP mentioned

 No.725

>>446
i guess i should just switch to onionchans altogether since glowniggers will spam cp on chans they don't like

 No.726

File: 1612717738109.jpg (63.43 KB, 850x565, 170:113, 1527048338169.jpg)

>>725
>doesn't like CP
>but wants to browse tor imageboards

 No.727

>>726
mods usually get rid of cp even on onionchans. nobody wants to touch that shit.

 No.775

>>726
There is like, not even a tenth as much cp on torchans
It's practically a daily occurrence on clear/hybrid chans like spee

 No.776

File: 1619679214146.jpg (196.14 KB, 750x750, 1:1, f27510e0bc002a632449fa3905….jpg)

>>461
> russia thinks it can impose its laws on an american site
> Japanese artists getting suspended on twitter because of Russia
https://otakubaka.com/amp/twitter-suspends-japanese-erotic-artists-at-russias-request
https://varishangout.com/index.php?threads/japanese-artists-getting-suspended-on-twitter-because-of-russia.258/
Lol kek. Almost exactly as OP has predicted.
Yes, we hate this censorship bureau…

 No.777

>>776
>the Agency threatened to block the use of the platform throughout Russia, and has already implemented some sanctions on the site if they do not eliminate the content that Russia considers illegal.
With small sites like this I doubt that kind of blackmail will work. More likely they'll just block access outright

 No.822

>>446
Deleting that type of content would be the better option at the end



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 76 / egy / h / kc / librejp / sp / v ] [ ukko ]