The more I argued with him, the better I came to know his dialectic. If challenged, he changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, he immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack this dutchman, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck him so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The dutchman had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
Trumps not a dictator, but i wish he was sometimes.
as for half assed theories, if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck.. it might just be a fucking duck. i dont think any of the 'hacked' or leaked emails of the past 6 years have been shown to have forgeries mixed in, despite all the incentive to do so. i think the instant, simaltaneous, and coordinated effort to discredit (through words only) and memoryhole this shit shows a much large propaganda threat than whatever this 'might' be.