>>1654791>hyperloopcalm down thunderfoot, you can at least respect the grift.
it is stupid tho
>Sunken cost fallacy if you're stupid enough to believe these will ever break even.you're actually retarded
have you ever looked at the cost per kg for moving shit to space??
payload delivery alone gives a ROI within a lifetime. factor in the as the price decreases, it becomes more open for anyone to shove money into the ring
in reality– yuge govt contracts would pay it off within maybe half a decade of being in operation. NASA spends fucking 3-4 BILLION on supply missions to the ISS alone dumbfuck.
all of that is besides the point really. because all the big aero defence rocket fags operate with the US govt pouring their fucking coffers into them for R&D ie they're operating significantly more effectively than their peers. the only difference in that regard imo is greater private equity for space x
>tesla reliant on green tax credits3% of revenue,
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.